xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?

To: Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:23:33 +0100
In-reply-to: <45F96150.50001@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <45F92D8C.3090708@xxxxxxxxx> <20070315150422.7bc5d178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45F952F2.6000008@xxxxxxxxx> <20070315160309.652a6e0c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45F96150.50001@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Le Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:08:00 -0400
Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

>     So if I see I/O activity and cpu activity, which I do, should I 
> assume that eventually the repair should return? 

The repair _MAY_ return, unfortunately...

>  We are thinking of 
> interrupting it and trying to add more memory and restarting it.
> Maybe we should just let it go. 

Yes, let it go now...

> If you think it might finish some
> time, even if it's going to be another day or two, then I'm willing
> to be patient. I'm just worried it might be going around in circles.
> 

It should finish if you're testing the right device, and the LV is
properly assembled. If it reach the end of the device and find nothing,
you should restart LVM first to check that your PV/VG/LV are correctly
set up, and retry.
If it doesn't work after that, backup will be your last friend.

-- 
----------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Intellique
----------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>