| To: | Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Should xfs_repair take this long? |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:04:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <45F92D8C.3090708@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <45F92D8C.3090708@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Le Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:27:08 -0400 Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > xfs_repair -o assume_xfs /dev/mapper/vg0-hladata3 > > This command has been running for two days now. Is there any output from xfs_repair ? This doesn't sound good. I've run xfs_repair on some badly corrupted fs up to 13 TB, and it never took more than a couple of minutes. -- ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ---------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?, Thomas Walker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS on Redhat4 U4, Carassale, Mario |
| Previous by Thread: | Should xfs_repair take this long?, Thomas Walker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?, Thomas Walker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |