xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?
From: Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:06:42 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070315150422.7bc5d178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45F92D8C.3090708@xxxxxxxxx> <20070315150422.7bc5d178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)

The terminal shows a lot of "." dots running across the screen quickly, and every few hours it says this;


.....................................................found candidate secondary superblock...
unable to verify superblock, continuing...
found candidate secondary superblock...
unable to verify superblock, continuing...

     Thomas Walker


Emmanuel Florac wrote:

Le Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:27:08 -0400
Thomas Walker <walker@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

xfs_repair -o assume_xfs /dev/mapper/vg0-hladata3

This command has been running for two days now.

Is there any output from xfs_repair ? This doesn't sound good. I've run
xfs_repair on some badly corrupted fs up to 13 TB, and it never took
more than a couple of minutes.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>