xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call

from [Paul Mackerras] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:15:29 +1000
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070330071417.GI355@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <20070117094658.GA17390@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070225022326.137b4875.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070301183445.GA7911@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070316143101.GA10152@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070316161704.GE8525@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20070317111036.GC29931@parisc-linux.org> <20070321120425.GA27273@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070329115126.GB7374@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070329101010.7a2b8783.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070330071417.GI355@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Jakub Jelinek writes:

> Wouldn't
> int fallocate(loff_t offset, loff_t len, int fd, int mode)
> work on both s390 and ppc/arm?  glibc will certainly wrap it and
> reorder the arguments as needed, so there is no need to keep fd first.

That looks fine to me.

Paul.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Paul Mackerras
Next by Date:  Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Heiko Carstens
Previous by Thread:  Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Heiko Carstens
Next by Thread:  Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call, Stephen Rothwell
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]