xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spam on list?

To: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Spam on list?
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:47:52 -0600
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Martin Schröder <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1170712730.18017.452.camel@edge>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73wt2wnbd2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68c491a60702050352t278e8381l72795ed9ea880029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702051306.34279.ak@xxxxxxx> <45C73CB9.5000402@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1170712730.18017.452.camel@edge>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207)
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:18 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Monday 05 February 2007 12:52, Martin Schröder wrote:
05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>:
Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted
from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad.
Then set up a list admin who can approve such postings.
That adds unacceptable latency. Also lists who spam senders
with bounce messages tend to be dropped quickly from cc lists.

Also you couldn't list xfs@ as bug report address anymore because
bug report addresses must be available to everyone.

In general it's a bad idea.

*nod*, it really cannot become a closed list.

Ok ok everyone, it was just a thought ;-)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>