| To: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Spam on list? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:47:52 -0600 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Martin Schröder <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1170712730.18017.452.camel@edge> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73wt2wnbd2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68c491a60702050352t278e8381l72795ed9ea880029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702051306.34279.ak@xxxxxxx> <45C73CB9.5000402@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1170712730.18017.452.camel@edge> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) |
Nathan Scott wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:18 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:Andi Kleen wrote:On Monday 05 February 2007 12:52, Martin Schröder wrote:05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>:Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad.Then set up a list admin who can approve such postings.That adds unacceptable latency. Also lists who spam senders with bounce messages tend to be dropped quickly from cc lists. Also you couldn't list xfs@ as bug report address anymore because bug report addresses must be available to everyone. In general it's a bad idea.*nod*, it really cannot become a closed list. Ok ok everyone, it was just a thought ;-) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Spam on list?, Sami Farin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Spam on list?, Jason White |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Spam on list?, Sami Farin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Spam on list?, Jason White |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |