| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Spam on list? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:18:33 -0600 |
| Cc: | Martin Schröder <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200702051306.34279.ak@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73wt2wnbd2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68c491a60702050352t278e8381l72795ed9ea880029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702051306.34279.ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) |
Andi Kleen wrote: On Monday 05 February 2007 12:52, Martin Schröder wrote:05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>:Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad.Then set up a list admin who can approve such postings.That adds unacceptable latency. Also lists who spam senders with bounce messages tend to be dropped quickly from cc lists. Also you couldn't list xfs@ as bug report address anymore because bug report addresses must be available to everyone. In general it's a bad idea. -Andi Well, I agree w/ those arguments too, Andi.I honestly don't know why oss seems to have so much more spam than, say, LKML. It is getting to a really bad level, and I sympathize with those whose inboxes are bombarded, too. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Spam on list?, Martin Schröder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 960791 - Fix assertion in xfs_attr_shortform_remove(), Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Spam on list?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Spam on list?, Sami Farin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |