| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] don't special-case 32MB machines |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:38:57 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070208192712.GA1461@infradead.org> |
| References: | <45CA7D7B.3060307@redhat.com> <20070208192712.GA1461@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:31:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This one may be a bit silly, but: >> >> All the special cases for 32MB machines probably aren't so useful anymore... >> >> Or maybe this points to the need to bump up the scaling points & sizes a >> bit? >> >> Also remove duplicate, unused XFS_MAX_RW_NBMAPS definitions in linux >> subdirs. > > Sounds good. Any chance you could kill off xfs_physmem completely? > Hm, why out of curiosity? Because you think xfs should never be looking at system memory, or because you don't like the name, or ...? -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix sparse warning in xfs_da_btree.c, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] Implement generic block_page_mkwrite() functionality, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] don't special-case 32MB machines, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 960369: XFS-QA-144-ERROR: get_bulkattr found 0 matching files (expected 50) in NUM loops, Vlad Apostolov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |