xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 959451 -

To: Madan Valluri <mvalluri@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 959451 -
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:27:53 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1170217442.18017.306.camel@edge>
Organization: Aconex
References: <200701310412.l0V4Cusv14683285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1170217442.18017.306.camel@edge>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 15:24 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Madan,
> 
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:12 -0600, Madan Valluri wrote:
> > xfs_repair - 031 QA failure with platform that don't use the uuid field
> > in the super block.
> 
> You mean "uuid in the log", I think - all platforms would have it in the
> super block.
> 
> > QA 033 failing due to root inode being put in lost+found
> 
> Ahahahaa - now thats funny; you just made my day... ;)
> 

Actually, you'll want to make sure that the 2 realtime inodes, and
the 2 optional quota inodes also don't ever get put in lost+found;
I've not looked at these fixes (I missed the request for review :),
but they could be in the same boat as the root inode I imagine.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>