| To: | Roger Heflin <rheflin@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs-questions |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:03:01 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <45B136D2.5080305@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <45AF4A1A.50805@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45AFA4F6.5040806@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45B136D2.5080305@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) |
Roger Heflin wrote: Eric, Very nice, it is very annoying the Redhat has a 8TB limit on filesystems. Well, ext3 can do 16T now... upstream and in RHEL5 as a preview. Feel free to test that too if you need a RHEL-supported solution (and if 16T is enough for you). I am testing it with 2.6.9-42.0.3. Great, let me know if you have trouble. Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Work on XFS at SGI?, Michael Gigante |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EXTENT BOUNDARIES, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs-questions, Roger Heflin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: bio pages with zero page reference count, Ed L. Cashin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |