xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze:

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock())
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:02:52 +0000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070108161917.73a4c2c6.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20070104001420.GA32440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070107213734.GS44411608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070108110323.GA3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45A27416.8030600@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070108234728.GC33919298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070108161917.73a4c2c6.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:19:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seems not.  I think people were hoping that various nasties in there
> would go away.  We return to userspace with a kernel lock held??

Well, there might be nicer solutions, but for now we should revert the
broken commit to change the lock type.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>