xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What's wrong with XFS?

To: Dave N <mutex1@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What's wrong with XFS?
From: Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:41:04 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <936386.57179.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <936386.57179.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
Dave N schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Even MySQL provides me with better data-integrity here. If I'm doing some 
> database transaction and the power fails, I can be pretty sure that *most* of 
> the time, MySQL will be just fine next time I boot up.
Hallo Dave, MySQL is an application which takes care of data-integrity (
which XFS depends on, as you stated yourself ;-) ). XFS takes care of
the filesystem-integrity, to enable your MySQL to find the files it's
caring of it's content-integrity ( as an application, you see ;-) )
> 
> Why oh why such a beautiful file system like XFS is so terrible at 
> data-integrity? Look what Sun Microsystems did with their new ZFS file 
> system... full atomicity, CRC checksumming and other features to ensure 
> data-integrity... why can't XFS have such things?
To mount multi-gigabyte filesystems after some kind of desaster in
minutes, not in hours or days ;-). It's only caring for meta-data, not
the data.

> 
> Thanks for listening to my preaching here guys
> 
> Cheers!


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards

Klaus Strebel, Dipl.-Inform. (FH), mailto:klaus.strebel@xxxxxxx

/"\
\ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
 X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>