Al Boldi wrote:
> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>> RAID 5 TWEAKED: 1:06.41 elapsed @ 60% CPU
>>
>> This should be 1:14 not 1:06(was with a similarly sized file but not the
>> same) the 1:14 is the same file as used with the other benchmarks. and to
>> get that I used 256mb read-ahead and 16384 stripe size ++ 128
>> max_sectors_kb (same size as my sw raid5 chunk size)
>>
>
> max_sectors_kb is probably your key. On my system I get twice the read
> performance by just reducing max_sectors_kb from default 512 to 192.
>
> Can you do a fresh reboot to shell and then:
> $ cat /sys/block/hda/queue/*
> $ cat /proc/meminfo
> $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> $ dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10240
> $ echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> $ dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10240
>
You can find even more joy on large writes, assuming you have a recent
2.6 kernel. Look at /proc/sys/vm/dirty-* values. by making the ratio
smaller, and the ratio smaller you can reduce or eliminate the bursty
behavior of Linux disk write. However, see my previous thread on poor
RAID-5 write performance, there's still something not optimal. Note that
RAID-10, which does more i/o, is faster with default tuning than RAID-5
by about N-1 taime (N = array drives).
I would say that the numbers posted are interesting, but most people
don't have a spare GB or more to use for buffer, particularly if you
have multiple arrays on your disks.
Before someone says "why do that..." here's why:
/boot - should be mirrored so the BIOS will boot if a drive fails
swap - RAID-1, because for an given tuning, it's faster than RAID-5.
Note: RAID-10 is faster yet, but Fedora
and SuSE rescue CDs don't like RAID-10 swap.
critical - stuff you can't afford to lose, RAID-6\
normal - RAID-5
That's why I have partitions of the same drives at different RAID
levels, and with various tuning settings, depending on how they are used.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
[[HTML alternate version deleted]]
|