| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()) |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:19:17 -0800 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070108234728.GC33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20070104001420.GA32440@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070107213734.GS44411608@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070108110323.GA3803@m.safari.iki.fi> <45A27416.8030600@sandeen.net> <20070108234728.GC33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:47:28 +1100 David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:40:54AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Sami Farin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:37:34 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > ... > > >>> fstab was there just fine after -u. > > >> Oh, that still hasn't been fixed? > > > > > > Looked like it =) > > > > Hm, it was proposed upstream a while ago: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/27/137 > > > > I guess it got lost? > > Seems like it. Andrew, did this ever get queued for merge? Seems not. I think people were hoping that various nasties in there would go away. We return to userspace with a kernel lock held?? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock(), Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS and 2.6.18 -> 2.6.20-rc3, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()), David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |