xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now)

To: <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now)
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:50:29 +1100
Cc: "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <agruen@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1166650831.5572.164.camel@edge>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acckf4tOyJTapNsgQ6Gid99G5oSsOQAEfxzA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Nathan Scott
> Sent: Thursday, 21 December 2006 8:41 AM
> To: lachlan@xxxxxxx
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; bnaujok@xxxxxxx; xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
> agruen@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now)
> 
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 16:03 +0000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:05 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > | > Please apply as an interim fix to the original problem and to
> > > | > the accidental new problems its caused, and I'll push 
> through a
> > > | > new patch in the new year.
> > > | 
> > > | There is a way to re-export symbols you imported from another
> > > | library with symbol versioning.  That how for example libpthread
> > > | works on recent Solaris versions.  I'll find out how 
> exactly that
> > > | should be implemented.
> > > 
> > > Ah, that sounds ideal - thanks!
> > > 
> > 
> > Nathan, do you still need your patch applied or will you look into
> > this new approach instead?
> > 
> 
> The patch needs to be applied, thanks.  At a later date we'll fix it
> differently, but that will take some time.

I applied Nathan's patch yesterday. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>