| To: | geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:30:18 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <457894DF.70603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45784E71.4080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457854CB.5030507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45787ED4.5070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45789341.6000809@xxxxxxxxxxx> <457894DF.70603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed >> upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o >> another... >> >> -Eric > > I have SLES 10 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) installed on the same box, > the kernel is 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp. Would it be worth checking that one > first? > Sure. -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Geir A. Myrestrand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |