xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:25:35 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45789341.6000809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: FalconStor Software, Inc.
References: <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45784E71.4080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457854CB.5030507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45787ED4.5070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45789341.6000809@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
Eric Sandeen wrote:

I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed
upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o
another...

-Eric

I have SLES 10 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) installed on the same box, the kernel is 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp. Would it be worth checking that one first?

--

Geir A. Myrestrand


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>