| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms |
| From: | "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:16:27 -0500 |
| Cc: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> |
| Organization: | FalconStor Software, Inc. |
| References: | <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45784E71.4080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457854CB.5030507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45787ED4.5070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> |
| Reply-to: | geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
Nathan Scott wrote: On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:51 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with "test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS?Yes. :) Current mainline kernels, or CVS from oss.sgi.com would have this fix I'm thinking of. Thanks for the "clarification"... ;-)I'll try to update the XFS code first, hopefully it won't break too many of the patches Eric had in his source RPM...but I will try to correct them if they fail to apply cleanly... I'll keep you posted. -- Geir A. Myrestrand
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |