xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:16:27 -0500
Cc: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge>
Organization: FalconStor Software, Inc.
References: <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45784E71.4080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457854CB.5030507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45787ED4.5070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge>
Reply-to: geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:51 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with
"test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS?

Yes. :)  Current mainline kernels, or CVS from oss.sgi.com would
have this fix I'm thinking of.

Thanks for the "clarification"... ;-)

I'll try to update the XFS code first, hopefully it won't break too many of the patches Eric had in his source RPM...but I will try to correct them if they fail to apply cleanly...

I'll keep you posted.

--

Geir A. Myrestrand

Attachment: geir.myrestrand.vcf
Description: Vcard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>