[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:40:28 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Aconex
References: <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45784E71.4080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457854CB.5030507@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45787ED4.5070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:35 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
> It wouldn't be easy for me to switch to a newer kernel, because it is 
> not just a matter of my machine --we have a product built for this 
> particular configuration. Switching to a new kernel would reset our 
> QA efforts.

You misunderstood me I think - I didn't suggest switching kernels, just
that you test out the latest.  If its OK, then its relatively easy to
search for a change that fixed it.  If its not OK, then theres a bug in
mainline which should get some attention too.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>