| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mkfs.xfs questions |
| From: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:57:55 +0000 (GMT) |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612052219440.22257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20061129174553.e0ef3465.jasmin@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612010410530.3735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061201183034.GA20595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612012349020.3735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061202111546.GA18661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612051741520.22257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061205212649.GV44411608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612052219440.22257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Christian Kujau wrote: I started a test with 4GB of data (bonnie++ -s 4096m) an hour ago... took 16hrs to complete, wow: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/amd64/2.6.19-git7_xfs.2/ http://nerdbynature.de/wp/?cat=4 C. -- BOFH excuse #293: You must've hit the wrong any key. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Review: Reduce in-core superblock lock contention near ENOSPC, Lachlan McIlroy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Recent changes in xfsprogs, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs questions, Christian Kujau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs questions, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |