| To: | bnaujok@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:10:58 +1100 |
| Cc: | agruen@xxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, It turns out (*cough*) that we use an export file with libattr, that I completely forgot about, which specifies the *xattr calls as part of the ATTR_1 interface. This patch reverts the syscall stub removal patch from before, includes Lennerts patch to fix the original problem ARM EABI, and I'll go think some more about how to properly fix this (I think we'll need an ATTR_2 interface in the end here, Andreas?) Please apply as an interim fix to the original problem and to the accidental new problems its caused, and I'll push through a new patch in the new year. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: xfs_ncheck (actually xfs_db) eats a lot of memory and is killed, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 958893 - Integrate existing dmapi qa tests into xfs qa infrastructure, Allan Randall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] rethink removal of xattr syscall stubs (for now), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |