xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: geir.myrestrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:30:18 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <457894DF.70603@falconstor.com>
References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> <45789341.6000809@sandeen.net> <457894DF.70603@falconstor.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107)
Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed
>> upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o
>> another...
>>
>> -Eric
> 
> I have SLES 10 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) installed on the same box, 
>   the kernel is 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp. Would it be worth checking that one 
> first?
> 

Sure.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>