| To: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected inode type 0160000 causes abort of xfs_repair |
| From: | Jonathan Groll <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:14:05 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <200611230047.LAA09023@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20061122201131.GD2493@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200611230047.LAA09023@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i (Linux mail 2.4.29-linode39-1um i686) |
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:51:11AM +1100, Barry Naujok wrote: > Can you try the attached patch and see how xfs_repair goes? Many thanks, the patch worked like a charm! Is it going to be incorporated into the package in future? Luckily I didn't have to blast the inode away, but I suspect that is exactly what the effect of the patch was ;-) Thanks again, Jonathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS CORRUPTION 2.6.17.13?, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unexpected inode type 0160000 causes abort of xfs_repair, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Unexpected inode type 0160000 causes abort of xfs_repair, Jonathan Groll |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |