xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:44:02 -0600
Cc: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <455CB54F.8080901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <455CE1E3.7020703@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45612621.5010404@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45627A4D.3020502@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1164157336.19915.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025)
Timothy Shimmin wrote:
Thanks, Russell.

I've been going thru the irc and just started looking at the patch.
I'll get back to you about it tomorrow.

I agree it would be good to have the fixed forkoff for data btree roots
as the first fix. And look into redoing the btree root for a later change.

My only question is, how much does this defeat the purpose of attr2?

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>