| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:44:02 -0600 |
| Cc: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <455CB54F.8080901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <455CE1E3.7020703@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45612621.5010404@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45627A4D.3020502@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1164157336.19915.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) |
Timothy Shimmin wrote: Thanks, Russell. I've been going thru the irc and just started looking at the patch. I'll get back to you about it tomorrow. I agree it would be good to have the fixed forkoff for data btree roots as the first fix. And look into redoing the btree root for a later change. My only question is, how much does this defeat the purpose of attr2? -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make stuff static, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |