xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:00:28 +1100
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45610761.50009@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Aconex
References: <455CB54F.8080901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BB70F203E29C2D37A2F727C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061117023946.GN11034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CEB981736A0E8C7DF9ABD7C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061117055521.GS11034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52841.10.0.0.2.1163745285.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1163746343.4695.152.camel@edge> <48064.10.0.0.2.1163776850.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1163977907.4695.157.camel@edge> <45610761.50009@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:39 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ...
> but it can't just be properly padded in the kernel and leave it at that, 
> can it?

I think it can.

>  If so won't attr2 filesystems on x86_64 suddenly start 
> appearing to be attr2?

What problem do you see resulting from that though?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>