| To: | sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:52:23 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <52841.10.0.0.2.1163745285.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <455CB54F.8080901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BB70F203E29C2D37A2F727C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061117023946.GN11034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CEB981736A0E8C7DF9ABD7C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061117055521.GS11034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52841.10.0.0.2.1163745285.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 00:34 -0600, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > and really, now that this is out in the wild, maybe sb_features3 > instead of padding is appropriate, and check both for the attr2 > bit...? :( Thats not going to work, theres three or four other feature2 bits preceding attr2 as well. The "take a 32 bit systems fs to a 64 bit system" is relatively uncommon, so I suppose its just something we live with (as we did with the log recovery issues in that situation for several years). cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches, sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |