xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS_IOC_RESVSP64 versus XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP64 with multiple threads

To: Sam Vaughan <sjv@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS_IOC_RESVSP64 versus XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP64 with multiple threads
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:25:36 -0800
Cc: Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <950D2C3E-11AE-4805-9286-65ECD880272D@xxxxxxx>
References: <1163381602.11914.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <965ECEF2-971D-46A1-B3F2-C6C1860C9ED8@xxxxxxx> <1163390942.14517.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <12275452-56ED-4921-899F-EFF1C05B251A@xxxxxxx> <1163395250.14517.38.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <950D2C3E-11AE-4805-9286-65ECD880272D@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:04:17AM +1100, Sam Vaughan wrote:

> Those extents are curiously uniform, all 32kB in size.

O_SYNC writes?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>