| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] libattr 2.4.32 arm eabi system call calling convention |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:38:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | agruen@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=1148133259; d=wantstofly.org; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=nDdJsXN9qs4fuWTOZUtx7Ypltqyui2H7X+k0yi1wh2aF4FXOf9VO4tnt8bvqH B8R9VRwcV3reeskX5aFfxa5SA== |
| In-reply-to: | <20061130092853.GB1534@infradead.org> |
| References: | <20061130025459.GA23869@xi.wantstofly.org> <20061130092853.GB1534@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:28:53AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > When building for EABI, a different system call calling convention is > > used where system calls are numbered starting from zero, not 0x900000 > > as in the old ABI. This was causing 'ls -al' with an ls binary that > > was built with xattr support to SIGILL. > > Please just rip out the direct syscalls. The days glibc provices all > the xattr syscalls in sys/xattr.h, and libattr should just forward to > those. Sounds like the better option to me as well. (Would have saved me a bunch of work, too.) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] libattr 2.4.32 arm eabi system call calling convention, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] libattr 2.4.32 arm eabi system call calling convention, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 954550 - xfs_db problems, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |