Re: inode64 workaround

xfs

from [Deanan]

To:	chatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: inode64 workaround
From:	Deanan <delusion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:37:14 -0800
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<456E30A5.6080109@melbourne.sgi.com>
References:	<200611290027.AA04740@TNESG9305.tnes.nec.co.jp> <1164838985.4992.30.camel@edge> <456E1B08.7090802@delusion.com> <456E2A30.4010101@melbourne.sgi.com> <456E2D0E.2000007@delusion.com> <456E30A5.6080109@melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

Thanks. Unfortunately 2.6.9 doesn't have it. :(

This is a sysctl, see sysctl(8).

It was introduced to XFS in October 2004, I'm not sure if it made 2.6.9.

If this doesn't help a little then I'm unsure why you think that inode64 is
going to solve your problem?

David

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 2/2]xfs_io man page, Utako Kusaka Re: [PATCH 2/2]xfs_io man page, Nathan Scott inode64 workaround, Deanan Re: inode64 workaround, David Chatterton Re: inode64 workaround, Deanan Re: inode64 workaround, David Chatterton Re: inode64 workaround, Deanan <= Re: inode64 workaround, Eric Sandeen Re: inode64 workaround, Deanan

Previous by Date:	Re: inode64 workaround, David Chatterton
Next by Date:	[PATCH] libattr 2.4.32 arm eabi system call calling convention, Lennert Buytenhek
Previous by Thread:	Re: inode64 workaround, David Chatterton
Next by Thread:	Re: inode64 workaround, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]