xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

2.6.19-rc5-git4 benchmarks

To: ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 2.6.19-rc5-git4 benchmarks
From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:09:41 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Apologies for the wide alias, but as it may interest serveral
fs groups, here it is:

In the everlasting search for the best fs for my shiny new disks, I
was interested in some numbers, here're the results:

http://nerdbynature.de/bench/amd64/2.6.19-rc5-git4/test-3/dm-crypt-3.html

details: http://nerdbynature.de/wp/?cat=4

(in short: ext3 pretty fast in all operations. then again, the numbers suggest that sometimes a crypto-fs is faster than withou crypto, eg.
'ext3_no-cipher' vs. 'ext3_aes-cbc-essiv:md5'...that's strange, no?)


Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #11:

magnetic interference from money/credit cards


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 2.6.19-rc5-git4 benchmarks, Christian Kujau <=