Hi Eric,
--On 13 November 2006 12:09:32 PM -0600 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Stephen C. Rigler wrote:
Greetings,
We are using CentOS 4.4 along with the RHEL 4 compatible kernel modules
(downloadable here:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.4/centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/).
According to the CentOS mailing list, the person at SGI who had been
backporting the xfs code for RHEL4/CentOS4 has left the company.
Are there any plans to continue this work? It seems like we are getting
bit by this bug: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=410 but it
doesn't look like the fix has been backported to the RHEL4 kernel
module.
Hot topic today; see my reply on the centos list and other recent
threads on this list :) I am planning to update the rpm package to
include some bugfixes soon, but it may not help your problems.
I had been tracking the sles9 xfs codebase as a fairly stable,
bugfix-only xfs codebase for this era of kernels; at this point I don't
-think- the extent changes you mentioned are in the sles9 codebase...
sgi guys?
If you are referring to Mandy's incore extent changes,
I don't see them in sles9 or sles10.
Having a quick look she has about 5 Mods.
linux-2.4/xfs_ksyms.c | 7
linux-2.6/xfs_ksyms.c | 7
quota/xfs_qm.c | 9
xfs_bmap.c | 725 ++++++++++++----------------
xfs_bmap.h | 30 -
xfs_bmap_btree.c | 10
xfs_bmap_btree.h | 8
xfs_inode.c | 1258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
xfs_inode.h | 71 ++
xfsidbg.c | 15
10 files changed, 1548 insertions(+), 592 deletions(-)
Quite a bit of changes there for xfs_bmap.c and xfs_inode.c.
--Tim
|