|To:||Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB|
|From:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:25:13 -0600|
|Cc:||David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<20061102172608.GA27769@pc51072.physik.uni-regensburg.de> <20061103004142.GI8394166@melbourne.sgi.com> <454B5833.firstname.lastname@example.org> <FFDFD6610F310171562D474B@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 22.214.171.124 (Macintosh/20060909)|
Timothy Shimmin wrote:
Good idea, Eric. I've created a pv. I noticed this was taken from xfs_mount_validate_sb() for the dblocks test.
I guess it would be nice to abstract this test in a macro for use in multiple places.
yep, it'd just need to be refactored a bit to support data only & rt only (for growfs), while mount wants to check both at the same time.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB, Timothy Shimmin|
|Next by Date:||Weird performance decrease, Sascha Nitsch|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB, Timothy Shimmin|
|Next by Thread:||Adding xfs to kernel 2.4.20, Uri Rotshtein|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|