| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Directories > 2GB |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:19:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <452B0240.60203@xfs.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20061004165655.GD22010@schatzie.adilger.int> <452AC4BE.6090905@xfs.org> <20061010015512.GQ11034@melbourne.sgi.com> <452B0240.60203@xfs.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:15:28PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > Hi Dave, > > My recollection is that it used to default to on, it was disabled > because it needs to map the buffer into a single contiguous chunk > of kernel memory. This was placing a lot of pressure on the memory > remapping code, so we made it not default to on as reworking the > code to deal with non contig memory was looking like a major > effort. Exactly. The code works but tends to go OOM pretty fast at least when the dir blocksize code is bigger than the page size. I should give the code a spin on my ppc box with 64k pages if it works better there. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs vs. lockdep, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 优惠代开各种发票 !, 张 海 景 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Directories > 2GB, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Directories > 2GB, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |