xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs vs. lockdep

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs vs. lockdep
From: Vlad Apostolov <vapo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:23:38 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <452B0E53.2070507@sandeen.net>
References: <452A8DE2.4000608@sandeen.net> <452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com> <452B0E53.2070507@sandeen.net>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909)
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Vlad Apostolov wrote:

Hi Eric,

Could you please provide some more information. What kernel, test case and call stack at the time of the crash.

Thanks,
Vlad

Vlad, for reference, this was a very recent FC6 test kernel, which has lockdep & slab debugging on. Oopsing is as simple as mounting & umounting. It dies in lockdep code.


See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209062

-Eric

Thanks Eric,

I opened a pv and I see David C. replied to your email too.

Vlad


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>