| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:19:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20060922161040.609286fa.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <45131334.6050803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45134472.7080002@xxxxxxx> <20060922161040.609286fa.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Andrew Morton wrote: So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the one above).eh? Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree. If I go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you guys merge the above mystery patch. (I prefer to merge the -mm patches after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I get bored of waiting). Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff from me? ;) well it's in cvs: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h but I'm too lazy to check git on a friday evening. :)Well, sgi-guys, I'll let you sort out which patch you want. Sorry for not checking cvs first! -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Write barrier support with LVM2/md, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |