| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:23:59 -0500 |
| Cc: | Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <45134472.7080002@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <45131334.6050803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45134472.7080002@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Timothy Shimmin wrote: Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and the existing code is different than what yours is based on. I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this: ---------------------------- revision 1.254 date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05; author: nathans; state: Exp; lines: +20 -5 modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure ---------------------------- I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old). I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them. So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the one above). Ah, ok, thanks guys. Should have checked CVS I guess. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_read_buf error 5., David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |