xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet pa

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:23:59 -0500
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <45134472.7080002@xxxxxxx>
References: <45131334.6050803@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45134472.7080002@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909)
Timothy Shimmin wrote:

Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and
the existing code is different than what yours is based on.
I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this:

----------------------------
revision 1.254
date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05;  author: nathans;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -5
modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a
Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure
----------------------------
I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old).

I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them.

So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
one above).


Ah, ok, thanks guys.  Should have checked CVS I guess.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>