xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_check - out of memory | xfs_repair - superblock error reading

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs_check - out of memory | xfs_repair - superblock error reading
From: Stephan Jansen <jansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:56:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060918222348.GY3034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200609181519.18448.christian.gattermair@xxxxxxx> <20060918222348.GY3034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,


On Sep 18, 2006, at 5:23 PM, David Chinner wrote:

On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:19:18PM +0200, christian gattermair wrote:
hi!

after a reboot of our box (debian sarge, 3ware controller, raid 5 - 3tb xfs)
we can not mount it any more.

from syslog:

Sep 18 12:51:36 localhost kernel: SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes,
realtime, large block numbers, no debug enabled
Sep 18 12:51:36 localhost kernel: SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
Sep 18 12:51:53 localhost kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Sep 18 12:51:53 localhost kernel: sdb1: rw=0, want=6445069056,
limit=2150101796
Sep 18 12:51:53 localhost kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("sdb1") meta-data dev sdb1 block 0x18027f2ff ("xfs_read_buf") error 5 buf count 512
Sep 18 12:51:53 localhost kernel: XFS: size check 2 failed

I/O error - something is not right with your raid controller i think.
Are there any other errors in dmesg? What does /proc/partitions tell
you about the size of the device?

xfs_check fails with:

xfs_check /dev/sdb1
XFS: totally zeroed log
xfs_check: out of memory

3TB filesystem - you won't be able to xfs_check that on a 32 bit system,
and you'll need >6GiB RAM to check it on a 64bit system.



I was just going to create a 3TB filesystem on a 32 bit system.  So
xfs_check will not work?  How about xfs_repair?  I assume that will
work but would like to know beforehand.

[stuff deleted]

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


--

----- Stephan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>