| To: | Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: swidth with mdadm and RAID6 |
| From: | pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:49:34 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10609151652070.31539-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10609151652070.31539-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:07:07 -0400 (EDT), Steve Cousins >>> <cousins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: cousins> I have a RAID6 array of 11 500 GB drives using mdadm. cousins> There is one hot-spare so the number of data drives is cousins> 8. I used mkfs.xfs with defaults to create the file cousins> system and it seemed to pick up the chunk size I used cousins> correctly (64K) but I think it got the swidth wrong. Worrying about the impact on performance of a relatively small thing like 'swidth' for something like an 8+2 RAID6 is quite funny. http://WWW.BAARF.com/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | swidth with mdadm and RAID6, Steve Cousins |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 955947: Infinite loop in xfs_bulkstat() on formatter() error, Vlad Apostolov |
| Previous by Thread: | swidth with mdadm and RAID6, Steve Cousins |
| Next by Thread: | Re: swidth with mdadm and RAID6, Shailendra Tripathi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |