xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Bug#387057: xfsprogs: repeated xfs_repair does not fix the filesyste

To: "'Ferenc Wagner'" <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Bug#387057: xfsprogs: repeated xfs_repair does not fix the filesystem
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:03:28 +1000
Cc: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <87zmd4jdzz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbXIhNXEILEpsB4TQq/G8AHj/wvfAAf6/iw
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Ferenc Wagner
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2006 7:46 PM
> To: Nathan Scott
> Cc: 387057@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Bug#387057: xfsprogs: repeated xfs_repair does 
> not fix the filesystem
> 
> 
> Still, xfs_check reported:
> => link count mismatch for inode 400254 (name ?), nlink 0, counted 2
> => link count mismatch for inode 4239409 (name ?), nlink 0, counted 2
> => link count mismatch for inode 8388736 (name ?), nlink 39, 
> counted 38
> 
> Further runs of xfs_repair didn't bring any change.  On the root
> filesystem the results are much the same, but xfs_check reports:
> => sb_ifree 3042, counted 3041
> 
> I read that xfs_check is being obsoleted in the future, but not sure
> which program to trust.  Are my filesystems healthy or not?

This has been reported before, can you try running an older xfsprogs before
2.8.10 and see how that goes? I think with the dir2 fixes, the nlink stuff
might be a tad broken. I'll also look into it from my end.

Barry.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>