| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: review: minor cleanup in xfs_read locking |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:09:45 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <44FB75CB.8050809@xxxxxxx>; from lachlan@xxxxxxx on Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:39:39AM +0100 |
| References: | <20060904101711.A3331169@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44FB75CB.8050809@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:39:39AM +0100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Looking a little closer... you could probably do away with the extra > pair of parentheses in the call to unlikely(). > Done, thanks - I'll push in most of my pending stuff shortly. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | review: minor cleanup in xfs_read locking, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: review: minor cleanup in xfs_read locking, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: review: minor cleanup in xfs_read locking, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 955302 - fix warnings, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |