David Chatterton wrote:
We already have a large number of changes queued up for 2.6.19, I'd prefer
that we don't add any more right now unless they are bug fixes.
I've raised a pv with the patch so that it doesn't get dropped.
No problem, and I'm not hung up about the change, just wondered if I should keep
it in my patch stack or if it had been dismissed as undesirable.
Eric Sandeen wrote:
This gets rid of some pointless macro defines... I had a version that
lower-cased it all too but Nathan liked this better, and he's the man! :)
Hm, what was the verdict on this one?