| To: | Masayuki Saito <m-saito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed [try #2] |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:19:02 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060831114423m-saito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from m-saito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:44:23AM +0900 |
| References: | <20060824171653.C3003989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060831114423m-saito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:44:23AM +0900, Masayuki Saito wrote: > Hi, Nathan > > Are the patches going to be merged? Yep, they're queued up for 2.6.19. Since it was a race found only on testing with a ramdisk (iirc) it didn't really seem to me like they needed to be rushed through for a 2.6.18-rc. The race has also been there for the entire lifetime of the Linux XFS port... so, not urgent (and not risk free either). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed [try #2], Masayuki Saito |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: Prevent free space oversubscription, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed [try #2], Masayuki Saito |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed [try #2], Masayuki Saito |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |