xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: review: cleanup xfs_da_node_lookup_int (was Re: [PATCH] XFS: possibl

To: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: review: cleanup xfs_da_node_lookup_int (was Re: [PATCH] XFS: possibly uninitialized variable use in fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c::xfs_da_node_lookup_int())
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:05:59 +0200
Cc: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rxxYU/+VbKyv9LpOX0R4rLHJS2wsXz4IEGtYAXvT67Tn7BRCPWf5HYnlwXwvtijae352Sht9AxZD6ujBSY7Q/sXKSDyxuEcGypZ84OAXs1nMRzV+FxRQuukfBg15fHgdK6+xpcPqGsjwnRmUf6pjWWuttLaXUbhWAevLIISkSoc=
In-reply-to: <20060814155609.G2698880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200608122334.21901.jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> <44DE9B86.90006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060814155609.G2698880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 14/08/06, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:24:54PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ...
> FWIW seems like there's a lot of unnecessary endian flipping in there too; I
> haven't tested this but since it endian-flips the magic into blk->magic seems
> like it may as well use it:

How's this look?

As far as I can see it looks good, but I'm still just starting to read
the XFS code, so I'm far from reliable yet  ;-)

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>