| To: | juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug in xfsrestore or NFS+XFS Filesystem on NFS Server ? Can anyone confirm ? |
| From: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:20:41 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200608120956.47466.juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200608120956.47466.juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060228) |
On 08/12/06 02:56, Juergen Sauer wrote: Since that the last restore works, I think there is a bug in xfsrestore or xfs/nfs in the kernel 2.6.17. Backupserver, Server, Knoppix are bugfixed 2.6.17(.7). Restoring the dump via nfs failed due "too much open files".Does xfsrestore opens really 512k files ? I do not belive that. So It could a problem in Kernel or NFS Stack be the problem. Not intentionally, but there could be a file descriptor leak somewhere in xfsrestore or one of the libraries it uses. Take a look at /proc/<xfsrestore pid>/fd while the restore is going on and see if the file descriptor list is growing. If so, it should indicate what files are being opened but not closed. Bill |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: cache_purge: shake on cache 0x5880a0 left 8 nodes!?, Paul Slootman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in xfsrestore or NFS+XFS Filesystem on NFS Server ? Can anyone confirm ?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] XFS: possibly uninitialized variable use in fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c::xfs_da_node_lookup_int(), Jesper Juhl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |