| To: | Paul Slootman <paul@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cache_purge: shake on cache 0x5880a0 left 8 nodes!? |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:59:27 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060810164222.GA16332@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20060810164222.GA16332@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:42:22PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > empty data block 10 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > empty data block 11 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > empty data block 12 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > free block 16777216 entry 10 for directory ino 1343747104 bad > rebuilding directory inode 1343747104 do subsequent xfs_repair runs go silent? if not then you've probably hit a case where it's leaving something icky behind and you have to manually poke it using xfs_db (i had this myself) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Negligible improvement when using su/sw for hardware RAID5, expected?, Brian Davis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Negligible improvement when using su/sw for hardware RAID5, expected?, Sebastian Brings |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cache_purge: shake on cache 0x5880a0 left 8 nodes!?, Paul Slootman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cache_purge: shake on cache 0x5880a0 left 8 nodes!?, Paul Slootman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |