| To: | Jeffrey Bryson <Jeffrey.Bryson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs for Oracle |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:42:15 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <91EDB00F83BAD443A9D05FA67623955A0154C169@QMAIL.corp.questar.com>; from Jeffrey.Bryson@questar.com on Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:14:37PM -0600 |
| References: | <91EDB00F83BAD443A9D05FA67623955A0154C169@QMAIL.corp.questar.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:14:37PM -0600, Jeffrey Bryson wrote: > We are debating which filesystem to use with Oracle on Suse9 or Suse10. > We are not using RAC. We found this statement in Metalink: > > Please refer to the link below that indicates that the recommended file > systems are Oracle Automatic Storage Management (ASM), ext3 (with > O_SYNC), NFS, OCFS, ReiserFS, and raw. XFS is not supported. > > We were going with XFS until we found the above statement by Oracle. > Why is XFS not supported by Oracle and > will XFS be supported any time soon? You're asking the wrong people. Let us know what their reason is though, if you manage to find out from them... cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | xfs for Oracle, Jeffrey Bryson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: review: fsblock zero - don't panic, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs for Oracle, Jeffrey Bryson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 'fbno' possibly used uninitialized in xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(), Jesper Juhl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |