xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)

To: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:32:31 +1000
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060731162535.GA15555@fi.muni.cz>; from kas@fi.muni.cz on Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:25:35PM +0200
References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> <20060720171310.B1970528@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20060731162535.GA15555@fi.muni.cz>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:25:35PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> : I've captured the state of this issue here, with options and ways
> : to correct the problem:
> :     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2
> : 
> : Hope this helps.
> 
>       I have been hit with this bug as well - I tried to clear the
> two corrupted directory inodes with xfs_db (as the FAQ entry says), then ran
> xfs_repair (lots of files ended up in lost+found), but apparently
> the volume is still not OK - when I tried to use it (this volume
> is a public FTP archive), I got the following traces:

There is now a fixed version of xfs_repair available - its in
xfsprogs-2.8.10, source is on oss.sgi.com in the XFS ftp area.
A number of people have reported success with Barry's earlier
patch, noone's reported anything bad, so 2.8.10 is out now with
the fix merged.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...), Nathan Scott <=