| To: | "Michael Li (Gmail)" <mikore.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DMF & DMAPI |
| From: | Dean Roehrich <dean.roehrich@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:39:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bc5727090607252124p4f1126cbh1ba0f0b47642592d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <bc5727090607252124p4f1126cbh1ba0f0b47642592d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:24:49PM +0800, Michael Li (Gmail) wrote: > Hi, Dean, > > Is there a way to dispatch the read event to different channel? So that we > can get both the DM application I mentioned and DMF work together. Is it > difficult to do? Seems not so easy... Given the existing DMAPI specification and implementation, I don't see how to to this. You're using the wrong tool for the job. DMAPI is not designed to be a generalized event mechanism. Dean |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Unresolved generic_file_write_nolock, Robert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE xfs_fsr.8, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DMF & DMAPI, Michael Li (Gmail) |
| Next by Thread: | review: block bogus bulkstat messages, last stage, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |