xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:19:45 +1000
Cc: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ml@xxxxxxxx, radsaq@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060720231245.GA32195@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from cw@xxxxxxxx on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:12:46PM -0700
References: <20060720161121.GA26748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060721081452.B1990742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201817450.23697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060721082448.C1990742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201843020.2619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060721085230.F1990742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201855270.2652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060721090015.G1990742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201910010.20652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060720231245.GA32195@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:12:46PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:10:46PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> > I can run this over and over, and the result is the same?
> 
> lost+found is recreated every time, rename it and you'll get less
> output

Yes this is the current xfs_repair behaviour (any previously
unlinked inodes will be found as unlinked on each successive
run, due to lost+found being recreated).  This will likely
be rethought soon (not far off), since it confuses everyone.

So, its all good - xfs_repair has fixed things and you're all
set now.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>