| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:14:52 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ml@xxxxxxxx, radsaq@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060720161121.GA26748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from cw@xxxxxxxx on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:11:21AM -0700 |
| References: | <20060718222941.GA3801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060719085731.C1935136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> <20060720171310.B1970528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44BF8500.1010708@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060720161121.GA26748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:11:21AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:28:32PM +0100, David Greaves wrote: > > > Does this problem exist in 2.16.6.x?? > > The change was merged after 2.6.16.x was branched, I was mistaken > in how long I thought the bug has been about. > > > I hope so because I assumed there simply wasn't a patch for 2.6.16 and > > applied this 'best guess' to my servers and rebooted/remounted successfully. > > Doing the correct change to 2.6.16.x won't hurt, but it's not > necessary. Yep. As Chris said, 2.6.17 is the only affected kernel. I've fixed up the whacky html formatting and my merge error (thanks to all for reporting those) so its a bit more readable now. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: stable xfs, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...), Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...), Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...), Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |