| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: file system defragmentation |
| From: | Cosmo Nova <cs_mcc98@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:23:42 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-reply-to: | <20050828034108.73921.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4f52331f050826001612f8e323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050826101131.GA24544@xxxxxxxxx> <4f52331f0508260848782f240a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E4E12CD035E14A4AB8C36E0F4B7143F7277DED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43112C5D.8090202@xxxxxxx> <20050828034108.73921.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
what is the maximum tolerance for the delayed allocations pls? I guess it's not possible to buf a GB size file and delay its allocation? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/file-system-defragmentation-tf255485.html#a5408752 Sent from the Xfs - General forum at Nabble.com. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: file system defragmentation, Cosmo Nova |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs FAQ update for write cache, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: file system defragmentation, Cosmo Nova |
| Next by Thread: | Unfixable XFS defect - fatal error -- can't read block 16777216, Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |